I see that letting go is letting go of concept. The concept that we cling to and rely on to be who we are.
What do you guys think?
Below are some Buddhist comments:
Sharon Salzberg
Vipassana Teacher and Co-founder of the Insight Meditation Society in Barre, Massachusetts
"There is no 'thing' to let go of, but a concept, an idea of an ego that burdens us. As soon as we posit a 'thing' to let go of, we're in trouble. We need to change our view of reality, not attack a nonexistent entity."
Surya Das
author, Lama in the Nyingma and Kagyu lineages of Tibetan Buddhism, and Founder of the Dzogchen Foundation in Bloomfield, New York
"Letting go in the present moment of the present moment, not to mention the past and future. Letting go of whatever is holding on. Total openness, naturalness, relaxation implies letting go of everything, totally, at once—in the now, in each instant, now and forever. A surrender to the ultimate simplicity of just being, which is prior to and more fundamental than all forms of doing. So let go of all concepts, including those of clinging and letting go."
Robert Thurman
Jey Tsong Khapa Professor of Indo- Tibetan Studies at Columbia University, New York City
"The habitual assumption of the individual, self-sufficient, intrinsically identifiable 'I' which we have assumed to exist from beginningless time. The key to the meditations on selflessness, emptiness, and so on, however, is not to jump into them right away, but to look carefully at what is this 'assumed I.' What is the self that the self-habit holds? Observe the self for a long time before trying to negate it. In the Tibetan tradition, they speak of developing a fragment of consciousness, a spy consciousness, that observes the self from the corner, as it were. The best time to see this 'I' is said to be in a state of injured innocence, when you are indignant, when you feel that you have been wronged. The thought: 'I am right. . . this has been done to me!' contains the firm feeling, the hard nut of the self.
"The key, again, in the Buddhist sense, is not dissolving but developing the ego into a more flexible and permeable ego. This is considered a strong ego, capable of both surrender and function. The weak ego is the rigid, defensive one."
Read More here:
http://www.tricycle.com/special-section/what-does-being-a-buddhist-mean-you?offer=dharma/