India then should be for Indians. Why do the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan refugees leech off India for 60 years? We can all see very clearly that the Tibetans are not Indians. They do not eat like Indians, dress likes Indians, talk like Indians and think like Indians. So why are they allowed to stay in India then?
When the Dalai Lama made such racist comment, you would think he has thought it out and how it will backfire him and his people. But then, again, there are many occasions where we see the Dalai Lama making firm statements that have proven to be wrong after. This includes the various times he announced that the Tibetans are returning to Tibet back in the 70's, 80's and 90's.
We know for sure by now that many Tibetans who left with the Dalai Lama in the 60's have either gotten other citizenships and have two to three generations living in the country or applied for the Indian passports and moved on. None of them continues to think that Tibet belongs to Tibetans and that they can only go back to Tibet. A racist statement like this is redundant and unnecessary when it will only further incite fuel of anger in others. What was the Dalai Lama thinking?