So let me get this straight, you believe the ban and suffering experienced by millions of people is necessary?
By encouraging people to see the Dalie Lama's actions as a Buddhas' skillful means to simply make a Buddhist Deity popular, you are necessarily saying the ban is good, schism is good, beating others is good, destroying others shrines and holy images is good, persecuting others is good, causing thousands of people to abandon Dharma is good, is important, is helpful, and necessary.
So someone comes to you crying because their family has been torn apart by the ban, and you look them in the face and say, 'well, just get over it, the Dalai Lama is Buddha and this is his skillful means to make our precious Protector to become popular; take a punch in the face for Dorje Shugden.'
A practitioners faith is so shaken they give up Dharma completely, and you say, 'well, you're the required collateral damage so Dorje Shugden can become popular.'
The Lama explains how the Dalie Lama is destroying the holy tradition of Je Tsongkhapa, and you say, 'well, you're wrong Lama, because the Dalai Lama is Buddha and all these problems are his skill for making Dorje Shugden popular, because you and all the other lineage holders teaching this practice throughout the world isn't good enough; don't you see Lama, he isn't destroying the tradition or reputation of the 3 Jewels, he's making Buddhism popular.'
Makes total sense you guys!