I know a lot has been said, discussed and debated on the matter... however, let me throw this in the spanner yet again with these two rather interesting yet contradictory statements below!
HHDL is a man revered by nearly the whole world, but surely we are free to ask for clarification when we see blatant contradictions in his words and behaviors or are we?
Whether we believe that this man is indeed a great being and hence immediately develop an air of hysteria should anyone try to investigate or critisize his actions (I too am guilty of this on occasion). We need to realize that the Dharma is still the Dharma and is not "conditional" to one perfect or imperfect (to some) practitioner. If the Dharma is to survive in this world, we need to be able to take an honest look at how it is being represented and promoted in the world.
There are many non-political spiritual guides teaching the pure Dharma of the Nyingma, Sakya and Kagyu traditions, as well as the Ganden tradition of Je Tsongkhapa. If we rely on our teachers and forget worldly motivations, the Dharma will thrive here in the west and throughout the world.
I am interested to see if anyone can explain this one to me. Here are the Dalai Lama’s own words…
“Anyway, Ling Rinpoche’s opposition to me receiving the transmission of that Tantra was based upon his fear of Dolgyal. Therefore, what happened was that though I wanted to take that Tantra, because of someone’s fear of Dolgyal, I was unable to. My rights to freedom of religious choice were thus violated.”
- HHDL, Second Gelug Conference, Dharamsala, December 2000.
So the Dalai Lama is here claiming that his Tantric spiritual guide was afraid of “Dolgyal,” a pejorative way of referring to Dorje Shugden.
“When I generate faith in the precious Dharma, I generate real faith in the precious Buddha. And I also have genuine faith in the qualified followers of the Buddha. The statement that if you have pure refuge, you will not be harmed either by humans or non-humans, is definitive.”
- HHDL, A talk on Dholgyal, Dharamsala, October 1997.
And yet in this statement above, HHDL is saying that someone with Refuge has no need to fear spirits. So what is he saying? That Ling Rinpoche doesn’t understand this? Hence why would Ling Rinpoche be afraid of “Dolgyal?”
Ling Rinpoche was NOT afraid of “Dolgyal,” something that would be immediately obvious to anyone who knows who this lama was. Moreover, Ling Rinpoche was incredibly devoted to his root guru, the renowned lama Pabongka Rinpoche, whose main protector was Dorje Shugden. There can be no question that he never feared the protector of his own spiritual guide, who he loved and revered. It seems HHDL is setting a new precedent for relating to one’s Guru, a tradition in a style not seen before in the Vajrayana.
So what are we left to conclude? HHDL says Ling Rinpoche was afraid of spirits. It seems that either HHDL is appearing to be lying, or he sincerely believed that his own spiritual guide had no refuge, and therefore is not even a Buddhist. Either way, it is not a pretty picture.
Is there something I am not getting? Perhaps there is truly a missing piece of the puzzle that will befit the
conclusion? We all want to see HHDL as a great being, but how can we, if we cannot even understand or comprehend this behavior?