Almost 60 years, now we can see the different between Chinese leadership and CTA leadership.
CTA in Dharamshala busying to discriminate their own people, keep their people in poor stage, create fear in their people through Dorje Shugden's ban, poor education level, polluted buddhism, polluted the lineage by Dorje Shugden's ban. Educate their peoples to scold any of their fellowship Tibetan that dare to sound about bad of CTA; to label them as China dog. At the same times, you hear how corrupted the leaders could be.
The China government working so hard to pump in money and manpower to develop Tibet, so that Tibet could free from poverty. Bring the Tibetan into modern world, preserved Buddhism by repair and renovate the old monasteries. Preserved Tibetan culture by having museum for example. The tibetan peoples in China seem more educated and have chances to be on international stage to performed.
I am not favor to China government nor the CTA, but, when the comparison is infront of us, which we can clearly see the different, we see the sincerity of China's government to improve and preserve Buddhism and Tibetan culture. While CTA is destroying and corrupt the Tibetan Buddhism. This is the time, CTA have to answered - in the 60 years, what have they done to preserved Tibetan culture, to preserved Buddhism, to upgrade the welfare of their peoples. Where are those donations, those funding they got from international?
To continue to hide and discriminate own refugees by using Dorje Shugden's ban is really out of trend. After all, H.H Dalai Lama have said, anyone can practice Dorje Shugden!
Below are the newsSource:
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-10/06/c_136662242.htmGENEVA, Oct. 6 (Xinhua) -- Otto Kolbl, an Austrian researcher at the University of Lausanne who has traveled extensively in China, stressed during an interview with Xinhua that China's Tibetan areas have experienced "impressive development" in the past decades.
Kolbl told Xinhua in his campus office, "We should not forget that lack of development is a even greater threat to the Tibetan people."
"If the Tibetan areas cannot offer to their inhabitants the prospects of a reasonably comfortable and prosperous life, the most dynamic Tibetans will continuously be tempted to leave the region," he stressed.
According to the scholar, compared to Bolivia and some other mountainous areas to which he has traveled, the infrastructure in the Tibet region is "very impressive", which gives the area a great advantage.
"Roads and mobile phone coverage are exceptionally advanced for a region with such a low population density.
"The Chinese central government has spent huge amounts of money to achieve this, and progress is ongoing," he said.
As an example, he said, "some fifteen years ago, to get from Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu province, to Hezuo, the administrative seat of the Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, took eight hours. Since the completion of the highway from Lanzhou to Linxia, it takes four hours."
Kolbl believed that local Tibetans are well-placed to capitalize on advantages from infrastructure improvement and from the development of their home area.
He noted that significant progress has taken place in recent years and a combination of several factors has led to the emergence of "a class of Tibetan entrepreneurs".
Kolbl explained that Tibetans have learned from the Han, Hui and other groups in China on how to engage in certain business activities where no Tibetan tradition existed in spheres such as the retail trade and tourism.
"The Chinese economy has achieved a level of development where more and more people can afford to travel for pleasure. The emerging tourism industry has channeled considerable funds to the Tibetan areas," he noted.
The Austrian researcher believes that Western media and academic researchers have a bias against the Chinese central government's policy towards Tibet and do not want to look at the facts on the ground there, by "sticking to their pre-conceived ideas".
"I recognized the Western campaign against China on the Tibet issue, especially at the end of 2007 and in 2008, and it has proven to be a disaster for Tibetans," he said.
"Tibetans never tried to build up their own independent country, and in the history no head of state ever recognized Tibet as an independent state," Kolbl added.
