As absurd as it may sound, Dorje Shugden practice has grown, spread far & wide, and become "famous" because of the controversial.
In the same way, Tibetan Buddhism in general has grown, spread far & wide, and became “famous”, because of Chinese Cultural Revolution-era suppression of Tibetan Buddhism.
Therefore, both the evil dalie, who swore in public and recorded in video that his persecution would be “like the Cultural Revolution”, and the Gang of Four, who promoted the Cultural Revolution, share the same nature of criminals against humanity, thus deserving precisely the same repudiation.
Many of the people come to know about the term Dharma Protector because of this conflict.
In the same way, many people came to know about Tibetan Buddhism because of the conflict between the Chinese Cultural Revolutionaries and Tibetan Buddhists.
Also, many people came to know about the myterious religion of the Yazidis in Iraq and Syria because the Islamic State terrorists persecute them, rape their women and children and sell them as slaves, drown, burn and bury them alive, crucify and decapitate them, and so forth.
Therefore, according to your logic, both Tibetan Buddhists and Yazidis should rejoice over the atrocities committed respectively by the Chinese Gang of Four and by Islamic State terrorists, because thanks to them their religion became worldwide famous.
Your depraved thought of rejoicing over the evil dalie's atrocities is the ugly result of your nauseating attachment to fame and recognition, which you project on your claimed religious brand “Shugdenpa”, which just shows how much you are driven by the eight mundane concerns.
And, of course, another poisonous root of your atrocious attitude is your attachment to your image of the evil criminal dalie as some kind of “divine being”, whose actions should always be justified, just like Jews, Christians and Muslims always justify their cruel, revengeful, racist, jealous, bloodthirsty “god”.
It is unfortunate that many have to suffer because of this though.
To you the suffering of the innocent, persecuted Shugdenpas comes almost as a second thought, as something even sad but actually not so important, given the mundane fame achieved by Shugdenpas through such persecution.
What is worse, you see such suffering as necessary (“many
have to suffer”, you say explicitly) in order to achieve what you see as important, which is the mundane fame and recognition of your claimed religious brand.
Your profile, therefore, is that of the debased, unscrupulous religionist, all too happy to see your own co-religionists persecuted and sacrificed, as long as through such suffering some mundane fame and recognition are achieved for you religious brand.
It is obvious as well how much the evil cult of the dalie lame and the eight mundane concerns go hand in hand, twisting and rottening the minds even of self-styled “Shugdenpas”.
