I was thinking this should be another thread already.
Obviously Geshe Kelsang accepts reincarnation. In his book 'Intro to Buddhism' Geshe Kelsang goes on a few pages talking about dreams, etc about the correct identification of his mother's reincarnation. Is that wisdom or mystical??
If Westerners can accept Geshe Kelsang recognizing the incarnation of his mother from his dreams and signs, why not other incarnations or oracles??? Oracles are super mystical and I am not into them, but all the Tibetan lamas pretty much are. My monk friend asked me how come I accept the teachings of the Geshes but not the oracle part?? I couldn't answer. It just my Western wrong upbringing and maybe some arrogance?
oops... Do Geshe Kelsang's Western students accept this incarnation?
I mean Geshe Kelsang said very clearly he found the incarnation of his mother among his students. I know he didn't enthrone her or whatever, but it's pretty mystical right? I personally think it's cool-finding incarnations and all. Geshe Kelsang does believe or 'promote' some sort of reincarnation 'tulku' thing in the case of his mother. It's all over his book.
And this young girl
(incarnation of Geshe Kelsang's mom and I think the name is Amaravajra) at a young age can speak Tibetan words like 'kyi' (dog). That is pretty mystical. Geshe Kelsang can have mystical dreams about finding his mother, but the oracle taking trance is not acceptable?
Shugden does not make sense.
Selective mysticism? Just thinking out loud ok? No offense to anyone.