As for somebody producing a stupid work, and others repeating it (because of faith in the Lama) I admit it is a possibility.
I nevertheless maintain, that the different Nyingma-schools are largely non-monastic, and for them, a monk can be used as a mere symbol. In that sort of setting, the saffron-robes are not an icon of veneration, but more likely a symbol of "renunciate non-tantric ways" - hence, an extreme to be avoided, and thereby trampled by the Protector in question. Here, monks exist as mere symbols, you see.
But of all the many "alarming" pics here, was the monk really DS or not? (I say not.)
Stop seeing shadows.