I personally think this is un-necessary.
Not that it is wrong, but I do not see the benefit, or I would have to be explained...
Christianity has this wonderful, most potent and powerful representation of the Christ on a cross, nailed through His flesh and bones, crucified, bleeding with a crown made of needles and blood dripping on His face.
This image is so powerful, it is a reminder of how committed Christ has been to others, to the point of giving up his body as a last teaching to His disciples (what an extra-ordinary level of generosity), some of them betraying Him, some of them denying Him.
The cross is showing us that He never gave up, even when facing arrest, torture and death, He never gave up on His disciples and even on His murderers, He forgave them, He saw that they were acting out of ignorance and pleaded to God to forgive them.
This act is so potent, it is being reminded to all Catholics when they go to church (not all churches have kept the crucifix to this day). Let's imagine the Buddha represented like that, wouldn't this bring a flow of tears to your eyes? Wouldn't this make your compassion and forgiveness grow? If Jesus was able to forgive those who were hitting nails through his feet and wrists, why couldn't you forgive to those who simply cut the queue in front of you?
Personally, I would rather not interfere with how Jesus is represented, I am not a Christian. Let's keep things simple. But I can praise Jesus's qualities without interfering.