Thought I'd pen my thoughts using, you know, proper grammer, punctuation and all. Felt this article was deserving of it!
When I first read this article, thoughts arose in my mind that centred around two emotions: hope and pain. Hope because there is no way something this...stupid can last for so long, and pain because I realised just how much the ban has taken away from every single Gelugpa, whether or not they practise Dorje Shugden.
The article posits that the ban nullifies a 600-year old lineage by invalidating every single monk's refuge, Pratimoksha, bodhisattva and tantric vows. In one fell swoop, the rug has been pulled from under the Gelug lineage's feet and just like that, thousands of monks are no longer Buddhist. In fact, prayer halls are now just empty spaces, with hollow statues, filled with powerless individuals endlessly reciting liturgies that have no results.
No results just because the Dalai Lama banned the worship of Dorje Shugden.
Just because the Dalai Lama banned the worship of Dorje Shugden, suddenly 600 years' worth of great masters have no results? No results? Can that really be it? Pabongka Rinpoche, Trjang Rinpoche, Lama Yeshe, Zong Rinpoche, Dromo Geshe Rinpoche, Denma Gonsar Rinpoche, Gangchen Rinpoche, Dagom Rinpoche are all without results? Are all without attainments and achievements?
Are all just like every single one of us laypeople who have spent lifetime after lifetime indulging in the illusionary pleasures of samsara?
But just look at what they have accomplished, with their huge monasteries (which are still active!) and their immense social work. On face value, ignoring the supramundane stuff that not everyone can accept, can we HONESTLY believe that these lamas are just like us, without any results in their practice just because they practise Dorje Shugden?
No, we can't believe that they have no results, it is just not logical. Such accomplishments cannot be considered 'no results', especially when compared against the 'achievements' of laypeople like us. Even neuropsychology (an immature science next to Buddhism) dictates that our actions are a reflection of internal workings; what we think on the inside, and how our physiology behaves, is reflected in our external actions and speech. So if these lamas are accomplishing such great external achievements, surely that must mean their internal workings are accomplished too.
So how can the Dalai Lama invalidate 600 years of logic, faith and belief, with the ban? Can he do it on the basis of his enlightenment? But if he's enlightened, how can he cause such pain to so many practitioners, as the result of such a hypocritical ban?
Okay, so let's ignore the fact that the Dalai Lama is Chenrezig, and look at him from the perspective that he always tells us to - that is, he is just a simple monk. Because, let's face it, not everyone believes that the Dalai Lama is perfect and enlightened. But everyone CAN believe that he has devoted his whole life to the study of Dharma, and is therefore extremely learned.
So how can someone so learned not see the hypocrisy behind his actions? After all, if simpletons like US can figure out that the ban debases 600 years' worth of practice, teachings and lineage, how come HE can't see it? How come no one has told him?
And if he can see it, how come he's allowing it to happen?
So when I read this article, I am also amazed and contemplative. Amazed because everything fits together SO well, and each time the ban is viewed from a different perspective, it still fits into the perspective that I started out with - that is, the Dalai Lama banned Dorje Shugden for a reason. And therefore I am also contemplative - what IS the reason for the Dalai Lama's ban? Why ban something when nothing obviously positive can come from it, and you yourself stand to gain nothing personally, especially in the light of arguments such as the invalidation of the Gelugpa lineage?
I simply cannot believe that the Dalai Lama does not know what he is doing, and I simply cannot believe that there is no purpose behind the ban. To me, it would be too simplistic to dismiss the Dalai Lama's actions as those of an evil person, because evil stems from the wish for solitary personal gain and in this case, I can see no way how the Dalai Lama stands to gain personally from this.
Has his image suffered since the ban? Yes because now people doubt the Dalai Lama, where they once gave him unquestioning support.
Has he received more donations since the ban? No and in fact, the monasteries are suffering because many of the lamas capable of major fundraising chose to stick with Dorje Shugden.
Has the cause for a Free Tibet suffered since the ban? Yes because now everyone knows the Tibetans aren't as hunky dory about human rights as they claim to be. Their cause for an independent Tibet has been overshadowed by the gross human rights violations from the Tibetans.
So the ban damages the cause for a Free Tibet, damages the credibility of the Gelugpa lineage and sets millions of people against the Dalai Lama and the Central Tibetan Administration. Is that what the Dalai Lama really wants? Is that what he hoped to achieve when he banned Dorje Shugden?
If banning Dorje Shugden really means throwing Lama Tsongkhapa's teachings out the window then I'm sorry Your Holiness, but it's just something I cannot do and strangely enough, the more I think about it, I have come to realise that it also something you just cannot and have not done either.