Author Topic: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama  (Read 8622 times)

icy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1491
Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« on: December 16, 2012, 10:08:56 AM »
New Delhi, India, 15th December 2012 - A significant and inspiring event took place today in New Delhi, capital of India the country where Buddhism originated 2600 years ago, when a group of Thai elders among nearly 50 monks and scholars met to engage in an inter-Buddhist dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Discussants from the Thai side included Phrarajnyanakavi, Phra Dr Anil Sakya, Phra Paisal Visalo, Dr Seksan Presertkul, Dr Krissanapong Kirtikara and Dr Veerathai Santiprabhob, while His Holiness was accompanied by Prof Samdhong Rinpoche, Geshe Ngawang Samten, Geshe Lhakdor and Geshe Dorji Damdul. Nearly 300 lay Buddhists from Thailand listened rapt to their deliberations.


His Holiness the Dalai Lama bowing to the audience at the start of the discussion with Thai Buddhist scholars and monks in New Delhi, India, on December 15, 2012. Photo/Jeremy Russell/OHHDL
Words of welcome and respect were pronounced by a lady representative of the Buddhadasa Indapanno Archive that was influential in organizing the occasion. She mentioned His Holiness’s having been a spiritual friend to two Thai Elders and expressed the wish that relations between the Thai and Tibetan traditions should continue to flourish. She said the purpose of the dialogue was to strengthen faith in the Dharma; reinforce relations between Thais and Tibetans and to promote other beneficial activities.

A short film clip showing His Holiness’s second visit to Thailand in 1972 was shown, following which a message from the Thai Sangharaja, who is 100 years old, was read. He pointed out that this meeting was very much in accordance with tradition from the time of the Buddha. He noted that the Buddha was remarkably open-minded and ready to listen to others, only offering his own views when invited to do so. While Buddhism has taken on different forms in different places, these differences should not be thought of as grounds for unthinking discrimination, but should encourage us to come together in dialogue to eliminate misunderstanding.

His Holiness began his address with customary words of greeting:

“Respected Bhikkshus, Buddhist brothers and sisters, welcome. I am very happy to see this large gathering of Thai Buddhists, including many monks. Since my first visit to Thailand in 1967, I have been impressed by the strength of Buddhism in your country. I recall that in my conversations with the Sangharaja at that time I asked what he thought of the fact that while Christian monks and nuns engage in widespread social work, we Buddhists tend not to do so. His reply was that it was the rule for Buddhist monks to remain in their monastery to study and cultivate shamatha.”

His Holiness’s voice was a little hoarse, partly the result of his having a cold, but also because he has just come from giving long teachings to some 20,000 monks in South India, during which he spoke for altogether sixty hours over the last two weeks.

Noting that like all other composite phenomena, Buddhism is impermanent and will disappear, His Holiness said it has survived for 2600 years due to the support of its followers, mostly monks. Now in the twenty-first century, even in countries with no previous tradition of Buddhism, interest is growing among ordinary people and scientists. He said that what he thinks of as the Pali tradition, to which Thai Buddhism largely belongs, is the very foundation of all Buddhist traditions. The ethics and discipline described in the Vinaya are the foundation for training both in concentration (shamatha) and insight (vipassana). He clarified that with the help of concentration our mind has the ability to remain still and by applying analysis we achieve understanding.

“However,” he said, “we must remember the rest of humanity. If we can create a more peaceful world, everyone benefits. And to achieve this I think we need to take a more secular, rather than a religious, approach to fostering ethics. Karuna or compassion really brings about inner peace and inner strength. Those who practise compassion become calmer and less subject to fear.”

He backed this up by reporting that scientists have also found that when you have compassion, your physical as well as your mental health improves.

When it came to questions and answers, His Holiness had some questions of his own. He wanted to know if there was any tradition of Bhikkshuni ordination - full ordination of nuns - in the Thai tradition, bearing in mind that we know such a tradition existed during the life of the Buddha. He also wanted to know about the apparent ordination of trees and it was made clear that this was a case of protecting trees by wrapping them in the monastic robes that command universal respect in Thailand.


His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Thai Buddhist scholars during their discussion in New Delhi, India, on December 15, 2012. Photo/Jeremy Russell/OHHDL
Asked about Buddhist practice for lay people, His Holiness said that evidently the Buddha considered lay people and monastics have an equal opportunity and it is equally possible for them to achieve liberation and enlightenment. However, monastics, with no family responsibilities only have themselves to look after and so have more time to practise. To another question about a Tibetan reference to the inseparability of samsara and nirvana, His Holiness laughed and said if we were to take this at face value, we’d have to wonder why the Buddha gave up his royal life and engaged in austerities and meditation for six years. Clarifying what happiness is he drew a distinction between short-lived sensory satisfaction like listening to music or enjoying delicious food and the more durable joy derived from mental happiness. This is an area that needs further exploration he said, remarking that English and other Western languages lack the vocabulary to discuss these matters adequately.

After lunch, speaking about “Solutions to World Problems” His Holiness referred to the violence and bloodshed that mark the twentieth century during which some historians say 200 million people died violently. He said,

“We need to find a new approach to creating a better world. We have major problems to deal with: climate change, population increase, the gap between rich and poor, and corruption. People voice anxiety about an ancient Maya prediction of the imminent end of the world, but unless we address corruption, which is like a cancer, we will face disaster. Religion is important, but has failed to check it. Democracy, the rule of law and freedom of the press should be able to put a stop to corruption, but they have failed to do so too. Even in China where these qualities are absent and all power is centralized, corruption remains rampant. The key factor is a lack of self-discipline and moral principles.”

He said once more that we need to find ways to promote secular ethics that flow from common sense and scientific findings.

“We should remember that the Buddha taught for the benefit of all human beings. We too are part of humanity. To solve these problems we have a responsibility to work together. As a Tibetan Buddhist my concern is for the whole of humanity, you too should consider more than just Thailand and Bangkok.”

Questioned about the global economic crisis, His Holiness said he was surprised when it happened and he’d asked friends about the cause. They told him that it occurred because of too much greed and speculation, so to an extent ignorance was involved. He pointed out the need to distinguish between greed and desire, because there can be positive desire such as the wish for liberation and Buddhahood.

With regard to compassion, His Holiness drew a distinction between the biased compassion we may feel for those who are close to us and the kind of pure unrestrained compassion that is able to view even our enemies as fellow human beings in need of help. Reminded that last year he said that Nirvana is not achieved through chanting and prayer, His Holiness was asked how to cultivate a proper view. He said,

“Cultivating a more holistic and realistic view takes time and steady effort. As I said I have just given a long and thorough teaching to 20,000 monks in South India. Did it bring about immediate change in their minds? I doubt it. They need to work at it over a longer period. What we need to aim for now is a kind of emotional balance; eliminating our destructive emotions is difficult but it can be done. We need to be rigorous in our training. Thank you, see you tomorrow.”
 

vajralight

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2012, 11:09:53 PM »
"He said once more that we need to find ways to promote secular ethics that flow from common sense and scientific findings."

The Dalai Lama really seems to want to destroy the buddhist religion...


Vajra

dsiluvu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1272
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2012, 10:13:13 AM »
Quote
With regard to compassion, His Holiness drew a distinction between the biased compassion we may feel for those who are close to us and the kind of pure unrestrained compassion that is able to view even our enemies as fellow human beings in need of help. Reminded that last year he said that Nirvana is not achieved through chanting and prayer, His Holiness was asked how to cultivate a proper view.

I love what His Holiness said here... and I wish it so much to be true... if this is really is how we should all be practicing... then the nicer and kinder we should be to Dorje Shugden practitioners, no?!

Why is it with Dorje Shugden practitioners you can be selective and harmful? If we are the enemies, then are we not the "special teacher" towards those who dislike us? In this sense, we should be treated better. So why is there discrimination here??

You may not like or agree to our faith and believes... but that does not condone to violent unjust treatment of discrimination... isn't that considered unethical by law wrong to do so?  Even Salem witches are not being discriminated in such a way today.

Are we not "humans" Your Holiness?

Lineageholder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2012, 10:41:44 AM »
Vajralight, I agree.  Ethics are not secular or common sense because if they were, everyone would be practising pure moral discipline naturally.  Compassion is not common sense - Geshe Kelsang has said that self-cherishing is as natural as breathing for us.

The Dalai Lama has failed to realise that if ethics can be practised outside of religion, there's no need for religion anymore.  I can understand what he's trying to do, to get people to practice moral discipline outside of a religious context because a greater and greater number of people in this world are losing faith in religion, but it would be wiser to promote religion rather than having it sidelined.  In reality, happiness is only possible through the practice of faith and that doesn't exist in secular society.  He's doing religion in general and Buddhism in particular a great disservice.  I believe he's actually harming Buddha's teachings.

Lineageholder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2012, 10:45:28 AM »
"He said once more that we need to find ways to promote secular ethics that flow from common sense and scientific findings."

The Dalai Lama really seems to want to destroy the buddhist religion...


Vajra

Also, the implication of  "...secular ethics that flow from common sense and scientific findings" is that religious ethics are not common sense nor scientific.

This is completely wrong.  Ethics are based on religious principles and you don't abandon this truth simply because it is becoming unpopular due to ignorance.

vajratruth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 706
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2012, 06:06:40 PM »
Vajralight, I agree.  Ethics are not secular or common sense because if they were, everyone would be practising pure moral discipline naturally.  Compassion is not common sense - Geshe Kelsang has said that self-cherishing is as natural as breathing for us.

The Dalai Lama has failed to realise that if ethics can be practised outside of religion, there's no need for religion anymore.  I can understand what he's trying to do, to get people to practice moral discipline outside of a religious context because a greater and greater number of people in this world are losing faith in religion, but it would be wiser to promote religion rather than having it sidelined.  In reality, happiness is only possible through the practice of faith and that doesn't exist in secular society.  He's doing religion in general and Buddhism in particular a great disservice.  I believe he's actually harming Buddha's teachings.

I can understand what the Dalai Lama is saying. The principles of goodness that is taught in any religion need to infiltrate the secular world, not only via the institutions of religion which sometimes require some form of “willing membership” but also through the mainstream non-religious means such as schools. Ethics, tolerance, kindness and self-discipline must be values that society readily embraces because it has become a norm, not necessarily because one desires to be religious. Therefore the same secular institutions that have wrongly but effectively planted the seeds of competition, rivalry, self-centricity that have given rise to generations of greed and violence should be redirected to cultivate ethics just as effectively.

However, because the secular world have not promoted a common sense based on the Vinaya, the prevailing commonsense has become the opposite of what the Vinaya advocates. And the only thing that stops the spread of the rot is religion. I therefore see religion as a counterforce for all the wrong values that has been reinforced and transmitted in the world. So, I agree with Lineageholder. Religion therefore must be made stronger rather than relinquish its role and hope that world figures it out on its own, and through other secular means.

With due respect to His Holiness, I disagree that religion per se has failed to check corruption. On the contrary on each personal and individual level, religion has been the most potent check on the rot of ethics. It is perhaps the institution of religion that has to be checked. For sure, there needs to be a clear separation of spiritual and political powers as both as mutually exclusive and serve different purposes. And we have already seen in the Tibetan example alone, how the non- separation of church and state have corrupted both and failed both.

I am surprised that the Dalai Lama is still taking potshots at China but glad that His Holiness made this statement: “While Buddhism has taken on different forms in different places, these differences should not be thought of as grounds for unthinking discrimination, but should encourage us to come together in dialogue to eliminate misunderstanding”. Dr Lobsang Sangay and CTA please take careful note of what the Dalai Lama said and apply to your unthinking discrimination that has created instead of eliminated misunderstanding amongst your own people.

Ensapa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
    • Email
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2012, 09:57:54 AM »
Vajralight, I agree.  Ethics are not secular or common sense because if they were, everyone would be practising pure moral discipline naturally.  Compassion is not common sense - Geshe Kelsang has said that self-cherishing is as natural as breathing for us.

The Dalai Lama has failed to realise that if ethics can be practised outside of religion, there's no need for religion anymore.  I can understand what he's trying to do, to get people to practice moral discipline outside of a religious context because a greater and greater number of people in this world are losing faith in religion, but it would be wiser to promote religion rather than having it sidelined.  In reality, happiness is only possible through the practice of faith and that doesn't exist in secular society.  He's doing religion in general and Buddhism in particular a great disservice.  I believe he's actually harming Buddha's teachings.

I think when the Dalai Lama says something like this, it is to appeal to the new and upcoming generation of new age people who want to believe that religion is bad for humankind and that all kinds of problems are created from religion. In some things it is true, such as the idea of homophobia was introduced by Christianity in many civilizations that never had problems with homosexuality before coming into contact with Christian missionaries. But the whole idea that ethics can exist outside religion is possible, just that it is often, not the easiest way out. Religion was created as a frame or a structure to make sure that ethics are being held in a certain way, but nobody can really say for sure that ethics really needs religion.

Lineageholder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2012, 09:20:32 AM »
Vajralight, I agree.  Ethics are not secular or common sense because if they were, everyone would be practising pure moral discipline naturally.  Compassion is not common sense - Geshe Kelsang has said that self-cherishing is as natural as breathing for us.

The Dalai Lama has failed to realise that if ethics can be practised outside of religion, there's no need for religion anymore.  I can understand what he's trying to do, to get people to practice moral discipline outside of a religious context because a greater and greater number of people in this world are losing faith in religion, but it would be wiser to promote religion rather than having it sidelined.  In reality, happiness is only possible through the practice of faith and that doesn't exist in secular society.  He's doing religion in general and Buddhism in particular a great disservice.  I believe he's actually harming Buddha's teachings.

I think when the Dalai Lama says something like this, it is to appeal to the new and upcoming generation of new age people who want to believe that religion is bad for humankind and that all kinds of problems are created from religion. In some things it is true, such as the idea of homophobia was introduced by Christianity in many civilizations that never had problems with homosexuality before coming into contact with Christian missionaries. But the whole idea that ethics can exist outside religion is possible, just that it is often, not the easiest way out. Religion was created as a frame or a structure to make sure that ethics are being held in a certain way, but nobody can really say for sure that ethics really needs religion.

Ethics cannot be separated from religion because the practice of moral discipline depends upon the good qualities of sense of shame, consideration for others, love, compassion and wisdom that can only be developed by following a spiritual path.  This is the major error in the Dalai Lama's way of thinking.  Ethics exists in secular society only because people developed good hearts and wisdom in previous lives in dependence upon following a spiritual path.  In short, what the Dalai Lama is saying is incorrect.

Ensapa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
    • Email
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2012, 09:26:04 AM »

Ethics cannot be separated from religion because the practice of moral discipline depends upon the good qualities of sense of shame, consideration for others, love, compassion and wisdom that can only be developed by following a spiritual path.  This is the major error in the Dalai Lama's way of thinking.  Ethics exists in secular society only because people developed good hearts and wisdom in previous lives in dependence upon following a spiritual path.  In short, what the Dalai Lama is saying is incorrect.

Unfortunately, there is a huge majority of atheists and new agers who believe otherwise. What you have just said there underlines the importance of religion, but how would you explain non religious people or atheists who are actually morally better than people who are entrenched in their religion? I have observed so many times of atheists who make better people because of the choices they make in the things they do that make them a far better person than people who are not. they do display better ethics, such as being considerate and making choices that are ethically correct as compared to religious people. How would you want to explain that?

Lineageholder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2012, 01:51:31 PM »
Unfortunately, there is a huge majority of atheists and new agers who believe otherwise. What you have just said there underlines the importance of religion, but how would you explain non religious people or atheists who are actually morally better than people who are entrenched in their religion? I have observed so many times of atheists who make better people because of the choices they make in the things they do that make them a far better person than people who are not. they do display better ethics, such as being considerate and making choices that are ethically correct as compared to religious people. How would you want to explain that?

That's a good question Ensapa! People cannot, from their own side, be morally better unless they have trained in the qualities that are the foundation of moral discipline that I mentioned before because everything requires a cause.  Dharma is the gentle rain of compassion and wisdom that nourishes those good qualities, so without Dharma, it's not possible to develop them.

My only explanation is that people who are now atheists, agnostics or generally people who do not subscribe to religion must have trained hard in these qualities within a religious tradition in various previous lives since beginningless time but for some reason developed wrong views and did not have the merit or create the cause to meet Dharma in their recent lives. Wrong views are so pernicious - it doesn't take much.  I know many people who are Buddhist but who doubt the existence of past and future lives, karma and other truths that are necessary to attain liberation and enlightenment.  Because of our obstructions it's difficult to develop correct views and so maybe these people who were previously spiritual practitioners fell into the crevasse of wrong views and in subsequent lives have had a negative view about religion or simply disbelief.

Ensapa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
    • Email
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2012, 05:13:12 AM »
That's a good question Ensapa! People cannot, from their own side, be morally better unless they have trained in the qualities that are the foundation of moral discipline that I mentioned before because everything requires a cause.  Dharma is the gentle rain of compassion and wisdom that nourishes those good qualities, so without Dharma, it's not possible to develop them.

My only explanation is that people who are now atheists, agnostics or generally people who do not subscribe to religion must have trained hard in these qualities within a religious tradition in various previous lives since beginningless time but for some reason developed wrong views and did not have the merit or create the cause to meet Dharma in their recent lives. Wrong views are so pernicious - it doesn't take much.  I know many people who are Buddhist but who doubt the existence of past and future lives, karma and other truths that are necessary to attain liberation and enlightenment.  Because of our obstructions it's difficult to develop correct views and so maybe these people who were previously spiritual practitioners fell into the crevasse of wrong views and in subsequent lives have had a negative view about religion or simply disbelief.

I think we need to think objectively in this situations and not go in a direction where we are actually borderline fanatical (You need Dharma to survive!!!!!!) although you do have a point that basic Dharma training is needed to develop the 'higher' ethics that are not the core ones. If you want to talk about the core ethics of Buddhism: no killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, everyone by default does not do them because it is to a certain extent, logical to not commit those crimes. If you want to talk about the higher ethics such as Bodhisattva and Pratimoksha vows, then those cannot be achieved via logic alone and those require transmissions and study and thus, is part of 'religion' that Buddhism is. Perhaps HHDL was referring to the core 'ethics' that I have mentioned?

Lineageholder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2012, 08:43:33 AM »
I think we need to think objectively in this situations and not go in a direction where we are actually borderline fanatical (You need Dharma to survive!!!!!!) although you do have a point that basic Dharma training is needed to develop the 'higher' ethics that are not the core ones. If you want to talk about the core ethics of Buddhism: no killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, everyone by default does not do them because it is to a certain extent, logical to not commit those crimes. If you want to talk about the higher ethics such as Bodhisattva and Pratimoksha vows, then those cannot be achieved via logic alone and those require transmissions and study and thus, is part of 'religion' that Buddhism is. Perhaps HHDL was referring to the core 'ethics' that I have mentioned?


It's not being fanatical to follow Buddha's teachings because what Buddha taught was the truth.  According to Dharma, all happiness and goodness comes from the blessings of Buddha.  Buddha's blessings turn our mind to virtue and without those blessings, there is no virtue.  I'm afraid I don't believe in core ethics, there's no such thing.  We are not by nature virtuous as this video will hopefully prove:

Are we really Humans,,Soo Cruel,, Small | Large
   

(WARNING: this is shocking and my disturb some people, so discretion is required)

Nobody naturally refrains from non-virtue as all actions have a cause and restraint comes from previous training in moral discipline which depends upon Buddha's blessings and instructions, either within Buddhism or some other religion, therefore religion is indispensable for happiness.

Ensapa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
    • Email
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2012, 09:14:21 AM »
It's not being fanatical to follow Buddha's teachings because what Buddha taught was the truth.  According to Dharma, all happiness and goodness comes from the blessings of Buddha. Buddha's blessings turn our mind to virtue and without those blessings, there is no virtue.  I'm afraid I don't believe in core ethics, there's no such thing.  We are not by nature virtuous as this video will hopefully prove:

Are we really Humans,,Soo Cruel,,   

(WARNING: this is shocking and my disturb some people, so discretion is required)

Nobody naturally refrains from non-virtue as all actions have a cause and restraint comes from previous training in moral discipline which depends upon Buddha's blessings and instructions, either within Buddhism or some other religion, therefore religion is indispensable for happiness.


Hold back there....all happiness comes from the Buddha?! that's actually going very near to the land of Buddhist fundamentalism, where nothing but the Dharma is right and every other religion is wrong because they dont follow Buddhism. I have also heard of Buddha's teachings that say that the Buddha is just helping us find our natural state of mind and our natural state of mind is pure and altruistic. If you say that we are by nature unethical, that means that you are also saying that the Buddha's assertion that our minds are innately pure, just that we have obscurations to understanding its true nature invalid. The video you have shown is because in China people have been too obsessed with profits for decades that human life means nothing to them and it does not really reflect the ethic bit.

vajratruth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 706
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2012, 06:11:38 PM »

Ethics cannot be separated from religion because the practice of moral discipline depends upon the good qualities of sense of shame, consideration for others, love, compassion and wisdom that can only be developed by following a spiritual path.  This is the major error in the Dalai Lama's way of thinking.  Ethics exists in secular society only because people developed good hearts and wisdom in previous lives in dependence upon following a spiritual path.  In short, what the Dalai Lama is saying is incorrect.

Unfortunately, there is a huge majority of atheists and new agers who believe otherwise. What you have just said there underlines the importance of religion, but how would you explain non religious people or atheists who are actually morally better than people who are entrenched in their religion? I have observed so many times of atheists who make better people because of the choices they make in the things they do that make them a far better person than people who are not. they do display better ethics, such as being considerate and making choices that are ethically correct as compared to religious people. How would you want to explain that?

Ensapa, we must acknowledge that there is a difference between religion and the people who claim to follow religion. Not everyone who regards himself  as religious is in fact faithful to what the religion teaches. Besides the fact that religion is sometimes misinterpreted or twisted to achieve a particular objective of control, most people look at what religion teach from their own prism of ego centricity. How many people who are involved in a religion actually commit entirely to live their lives by the teaching anyway?

The purpose of there being religion is because human beings are flawed to begin with. Whether you see it from a Christian perspective where man is born with sin, or the Buddhist angle where man is born with an existing store of negative karma that distorts his mind, you arrive at the same place , that is, without proper guidance and without learning certain skills we are all prone to act out our flaws. Hence, it is important to always have religion and religious institutions for man to go to, or to be taken to.

But there are no absolutes and we cannot say that all without religion are incapable of ethical behavior, and neither can we say that all those with religion are ethical. A lot depends on our individual consciousness and from a Buddhist lens we know that our individual karmic imprints determine quite a bit of our proclivity to have a certain attitude and behave in a certain manner.

I feel the Buddha is correct to say that we are all innately pure but that purity is shrouded by a lot of obscurations, and during these times, so thick that we cannot connect with it. And hence, as Geshe Kelsang implied, working out of our impurities has become the norm. That is why Buddhism is so relevant today. Or to be more accurate, the Dharma is so desperately needed today. The Dharma is probably the only religious philosophy that can carry the kernels of wisdom and compassion (which combine to instill a strong sense of ethics) into secular society and make it apply on a multi-dimensional level without the packaging of religion or God-ness.  And I think this is what the Dalai Lama was referring to.  And indeed if there were ways for Buddhist philosophies to flow through secular apparatus, then great. I don’t think that at the foundation level, you need to be a Buddhist to practice the Dharma.

When the Dalai Lama said that religion itself is not adequate as he has before, I think his meaning is that due to our heavy negative karma, we are unable to transcend the obstacles we face in our secular lives to even consider higher learning through religion. And I feel that is why Dorje Shugden is so vitally relevant today as a Buddha that takes on a worldly form to help us remove those worldly obstacles and guide us back to the right path.



Ensapa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4124
    • Email
Re: Thai Buddhists in Dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2013, 12:00:18 PM »
Ensapa, we must acknowledge that there is a difference between religion and the people who claim to follow religion. Not everyone who regards himself  as religious is in fact faithful to what the religion teaches. Besides the fact that religion is sometimes misinterpreted or twisted to achieve a particular objective of control, most people look at what religion teach from their own prism of ego centricity. How many people who are involved in a religion actually commit entirely to live their lives by the teaching anyway?

The purpose of there being religion is because human beings are flawed to begin with. Whether you see it from a Christian perspective where man is born with sin, or the Buddhist angle where man is born with an existing store of negative karma that distorts his mind, you arrive at the same place , that is, without proper guidance and without learning certain skills we are all prone to act out our flaws. Hence, it is important to always have religion and religious institutions for man to go to, or to be taken to.

But there are no absolutes and we cannot say that all without religion are incapable of ethical behavior, and neither can we say that all those with religion are ethical. A lot depends on our individual consciousness and from a Buddhist lens we know that our individual karmic imprints determine quite a bit of our proclivity to have a certain attitude and behave in a certain manner.

I feel the Buddha is correct to say that we are all innately pure but that purity is shrouded by a lot of obscurations, and during these times, so thick that we cannot connect with it. And hence, as Geshe Kelsang implied, working out of our impurities has become the norm. That is why Buddhism is so relevant today. Or to be more accurate, the Dharma is so desperately needed today. The Dharma is probably the only religious philosophy that can carry the kernels of wisdom and compassion (which combine to instill a strong sense of ethics) into secular society and make it apply on a multi-dimensional level without the packaging of religion or God-ness.  And I think this is what the Dalai Lama was referring to.  And indeed if there were ways for Buddhist philosophies to flow through secular apparatus, then great. I don’t think that at the foundation level, you need to be a Buddhist to practice the Dharma.

When the Dalai Lama said that religion itself is not adequate as he has before, I think his meaning is that due to our heavy negative karma, we are unable to transcend the obstacles we face in our secular lives to even consider higher learning through religion. And I feel that is why Dorje Shugden is so vitally relevant today as a Buddha that takes on a worldly form to help us remove those worldly obstacles and guide us back to the right path.

The innately pure theory is the same as Conficius's theory about people, that everyone is born with a natural stroke of humanity -- that everyone is born humane or with ethics. Ethics can be divided in to ethics that are conditioned by society or by a religion, and ethics that arise from common sense and experience. The former may change according to conditions but i dont think the latter will. For example, killing another person and stealing from another person are both universal no matter which country you go. Also, dont forget that people these days do not wish to be tied down with conventions such as religion as they want more "freedom", so perhaps the Dalai Lama wants to reach out to these people.