"The demonstration of the dharma by the Buddhas"
Conceptualization functions within projecting an aspect of itself in the form of something out there, taking what is not that to be that. Since it is, in and of itself, ignorance it is impossible that all obscuration of what is really there has been destroyed. hence through the power of the perfection of wisdom knowledge of the Lord Buddhas who are ever in equipoise there comes forth for the fortunates, in accord with their belief, the appearance of an unalloyed demonstration that is the particular state (pratyaya) of their own knowledge. Thus we posit the Lord's demonstration (of doctrine) in line with their particular state of mind.
Light for the Abhisamayalamkara
And:
Therefore the demonstration, in its nature the trainee's knowledge appearing as words, is, yet, connected with the person who hears it. Just as, having taken it to be the demonstration (of Dharma) by the Buddhas, it "should be worshipped", "because it has come forth from" under the governance of "the perfection of wisdom" knowledge, similarly, because the "demonstration by the dharma-preachers" of this present time has come down through the power of the tradition reaching back to the Lord, it "should be worshipped" because it has come forth" from "under the governance of the "perfection of wisdom" knowledge.
Light for the Abhisamayalamkara
And
Sacred word. You have to posit appearances as the Teacher, and appearances as the two Form Bodies and their demonstration of, for example, the twelve divisions of the sacred word as the mere appearance to others to be trained. So too with the sacred word of the Buddha in its entirety: dependent on the Buddha's illusion-like knowledge acting as an empowering condition, and the mind-stream of trainees as causal condition, it is that trainee's consciousness itself appearing in the form of those speeches, names, and syllables. Hence you have to connect it with the mind-stream of the listener, and not connect it with the mind-stream of the Buddhas, or else Buddhas will have interior consciousness, ignorance settling on external sounds, and they will not have eliminated all obscuration.
Golden Garland of Eloquence
And you posit those listeners' representations, furthermore, as created by a Buddha's power because they have originated from it, just as you say of what is in fact a representation - mantras and so forth found in a dream through the power of a god - that they were divinely created, even though they are your own consciousness.
Golden Garland of Eloquence
Appearances as words in prose and meter are the collection of the listener's representations operating in tandem with asserted meanings.
The Mahayana Compendium Exegesis
Similarly Vinita-deva's Subcommentary on Vasubandhu's Twenty Verses and the Commentary on Dharmakirti's Proof of Other Minds also say that scripture is just consciousness appearing as verse and prose, or in the form of an essay, or in the form of speech, names and syllables.
Golden Garland of Eloquence