His Holiness is surely trying to spread the wider teachings of the Dharma as contained within the Tibetan tradition, it's just that on this issue things can get more than a little heated for sure.
Never heard that lying, promoting religious intolerance and witch-hunting, defaming and deriding one's gurus, inciting the murdering of lamas, self-immolations and bloody riots, and violence in general -- the well know actions of the evil dalai -- are ”teachings of the Dharma”, let alone ”wider teachings of the Dharma” according to any tradition whatsoever.
I myself believe him to be Chenrezig in human form, so I cannot fault him in any way.
There is no need to fault anyone, not even the evil dalai. It's enough not to show accomplicity with his evil actions, as described above.
Besides, the argument of ”infallible authority” was explicitly rejected by the Buddha himself, and is the very source of religious fundamentalism and intolerance, which you obviously embrace.
They way i look at the situation is that this is part of some divine plan to spread the teachings even further.
Jews, Christians, and Muslims try to justify in a similar way the abominable actions they ascribe to their cruel, bloodthirsty ”god”, as proudly described in their own scriptures. Buddhism, however, is not about selling ”divine plans” aiming at the sanctification of evil, which is at the very root of religious fanaticism, intolerance, fundamentalism, and violence.
Yes there have been causalities on either side, but maybe it is for a bigger purpose.
The main casualty of the primitive, fanatical, non-Buddhist attitude of accepting ”infallible authorities” and thus sanctifying evil is one's own loss of self-respect.
Even the Bodhisattva kings of Tibet had to be brutal in their approach to unite the country in order to preserve the teachings as it was transmitted in its entirety from India, where it was virtually destroyed.
This is similar to what the Jews say in order to justify the horrendous crimes perpetrated by their ”prophets” such as Moses, and proudly described in their own scriptures. However, Buddhadharma is not about state building by any means, let alone brutal means, but about liberation and enlightenment.
Besides, at the time of the so-called ”bodhisattva kings”, to whom you ascribe so much brutality, Buddhism was flourishing in India, and continued to flourish for many more hundreds of years. This shows how inaccurate and unreliable are your thoughtless, pseudo-historical statements, which you utter in your frenzy to justify evildoing and brutality.
Anyway, you managed to make clear that for your brutality is fully justified, as long as an ”inffallible authority” is behind it. This makes of you twice a non-Buddhist: because you accept ”infallible authorities”, the source of every fundamentalism, and because you accept, justify, and sanctify brutality and evildoing.
There was a purpose behind it, but i'm sure those in the midst of the wars and reformations had different opinions and could not understand what was truly happening.
You are obviously poisoned by the Jewish concepts of a ”promised land” and of a ”divine plan” to establish it, and therefore developed the schizophrenic-psychotic belief that every crime and brutality is justified in order to fulfill the ”divine plan” to establish a Buddhist ”promised land” in Tibet, under the leadership of your ”infallible hero”, the evil dalai.
However, Buddhism does not require a ”promised land”, and rejects any ”divine plan” behind samsara and its evils, as much as it rejects any ”infallible authorities”, belief in which being at the very source of every religious fundamentalism, fanaticism and violence -- the brutality you admire and defend so much.
I pray that when the ban is finally lifted, we will be able to know a least a little of what it was really for.
This you can know right know. The ban is enforced by the evil dalai so that people develop fanatical, violence-supporting views, and engage in violence-supporting actions, precisely as you do.
As for the world oblivious to his contradictions. I think people see what he stands for en masse, and need a hero to admire on the world stage, they see in him all that is virtuous.
Indeed. People like you see that the evil dalai stands for brutality, and therefore admire and justify such brutality as a ”virtue”, which is exactly what you have just done.
Once that is done, you understand that what is being promoted by the CTA is utter falsity.
In the same way that Christians and Muslims shift to a ”devil” the blame for the crimes of their gruesome ”god”, fanatical dalaites shift to a ”CTA” the blame for the crimes of their beloved, evil dalai.
This shows that the need for an ”infallible authority”, the ensuing fanaticism, the condoning of brutality and violence, and the need for a ”devil” whom to blame for the crimes of one's ”infallible hero” are all part of the same personality disorder, which takes ideological shape both in Abrahamic, ”infallible authority”-based ”religions”, and in this new fanatical, fundamentalistic, brutal, murderous ideology, let's call it ”dalaism”.
