A lama spoke about judging lamas, especially that if we start saying this lama is incorrect or has a flaw or is not the correct one, then doubt can be thrown in not to only lamas, but teachings of the past, dharma texts written by certain lamas etc.
This is a sordid attempt to transfer to the student the faults of the supposed lama. If the self-styled lama spoils and corrupts the teachings, as the evil dalai does, the fault belongs to corrupting teacher, not to the student. Why don't you name the corrupt ”lama” proclaiming such an anti-Buddhist absurdity?
Besides, Maitreya's
Ornament of the Mahayana Sutras insists on the need of carefully judging of the proposed lama, before even accepting him as such. And the very first quality required from a teacher is a disciplined mind, which the evil dalai obviously lacks.
The evil dalai, possessed by his power greed, encourages self-immolation, promotes witch hunts, and like a mad dog infected with rabies spreads hatred and dissension among the people, and causes the severance of sacred guru-disciple bonds. He reacts angrily, fully out of control, even to a simple, peaceful nun.
Therefore, according to Maitreya, the self-styled Chenrezig impostor does not qualify as a teacher. Your unnamed ”lama”, who contradicted the teachings and wanted to forbid judging of lamas, obviously motivated by the eight mundane concerns, just wanted to give himself some immunity and infallibility status.
If we can say Dalai Lama is the fake one, which I doubt it, if he is the fake dalai lama he has certainly captivated the world and many of the top minds of the world.
So what. Many criminals did. This only shows the power of human stupidity. That's why the advice of the Buddha was to rely on yourself, on your own judging powers, on reason and direct perception, not on the opinions of others, not even of the Buddha himself.
But for you what counts is what the media says. You gave up your human dignity, you accepted to become a remote-controlled zombie, repeating the commonly accepted, media induced opinion, just because it is commonly accepted. You are not interested in liberation, but in only complying with commonly accepted opinion.
How many fake people can do that to such a level, sleep little, no indulgence teach, talk and rationalise.
Many maniacs do the same. But, just like with the evil dalai, only evil comes from this maniac behavior.
What evil being will give so much relief
Which relief? The relief of the self-immolator burning in flames? The relief of the divided families? The relief of the student separated fro him guru? The relief of being treated like a pariah and refused medical assistance, education, documents, and every basic human right? The relief of being beaten and stoned by witch hunters?
and inspire so many to do dharma practice?
Which ”dharma practice”? The sordid personality cult you obviously engage in?
Can a negative and evil mind bring benefit to so many?
Which benefit, apart from the miseries above? Maybe the benefit of being a useful puppet for Western anti-humanity geopolitical interests, those controlling the media, the same media telling you to venerate the evil criminal.
If we can call the Dalai Lama fake, then the same accusations can be hurled on to Karmapa, Sakya Trinzin, Dilgo Khyentse etc etc,so where does the buck stop?
Wherever fakeness stops. Samsara is where fakeness prevail. Instead of carefully checking for yourself, you obviously rely on big names and titles. Therefore, you are possessed by the eight mundane concerns, and are just a fake Dharma practitioner yourself.
Then we can go on is this dharma text composed by so and so is it authentic and dharma, where does this end?
Use your own reason, this is the advice of the Buddha. Do not accept just any garbage just because it labels itself ”Dharma”.
Not to forget the Dalai Lama in previous incarnation was the lineage holder of the Lamrim from Je Atisha.
This is the story the evildoer and his minions tell you. It is intended to deceive people wanting to be deceived, like you.
If we go with such a thinking we won't be practicing dharma we will just be seeing the faults of others and checking which Lama is incorrect now? How beneficial will this be?
The benefit of properly checking the proposed lama, and of resolutely rejecting a fake, is that one is able to start practicing Dharma, as opposed to just faking it, as you do.
