Tibet is ruled under the Sovereignty of China since the time of the Great Fifth. Historically Tibet has never been an independent state. The following historical points clarify the true state of affairs:
"After the Great Fifth’s two-month visit, the emperor also granted him an honorific title, a golden certificate of appointment and a golden seal of authority as well as expensive gifts. This incident set a precedent for future Dalai Lamas to officially receive their post from the imperial court.
It is interesting that this painting of the 5th Dalai Lama and the Emperor Shunzhi are found not on the walls of Chinese palaces, but in the Dalai Lama’s Potala Palace in Lhasa, Tibet.
Do note that the Chinese emperor is clearly depicted to be sitting higher than the Dalai Lama – a sign of the deference and respect which the Tibetans paid to the Chinese royalty."
http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/features/emperors-of-china/Meeting Between Emperor Shunzhi and the Great Fifth Dalai Lama
This picture is a clear illustration that Tibet is under the Sovereignty of China from historical time. If this is not so, the level of seating depicted on the painting would be on the same level of one Emperor with another Emperor of a different country. Why would the 5th Dalai Lama be seated on a lower level to the Chinese Emperor? This is recorded through the painting by Tibetans themselves and is placed on the wall of Potala. Besides the Dalai Lama has to receive the decree from the Chinese imperial court for his official appointment as the Dalai Lama.
Why would China grant independence to Tibet when Tibet has always been under Chinese rule since ancient time? Morever, China has since injected huge sum of money into modernising Tibet with education prospects, infrastructure, buildings and providing job opportunities to upgrade Tibet and Tibetans. Tibetans cannot deny but have to admit that they will not be able to accomplish in-so-far as what the Chinese have done for them. China has since been liberal in granting religious freedom in Tibet with co-operation from Tibetans. Ironically, Tibetans in Tibet are enjoying religious freedom far more than their counter parts in exile.
In reality, Lord Dorje Shugden helped Tibet to preserve the Dalai Lama and its rich cultural heritage by planning, advising and escorting the l4th Dalai Lama out of danger to freedom.
Claiming the practice of Shugden harms the independence of Tibet is without any substance is absurd. It is a propaganda to divert the focus on their failure in achieving independence for Tibet since their exile in 1959.