More News About Dalai Lama's Ban (The London Economic)

[vajratruth]

If the Dalai Lama is hoping for the furore over his oppressive religious ban to dissipate, then His Holiness has got another thing coming. Increasingly news of the Shugden ban are being reported worldwide and the latest is this piece by UK-based journalist Indy Hack, published by The London Economic (dot.com), "Would the real Dalai Lama please stand up". http://www.thelondoneconomic.com/2014/07/07/would-the-real-dalai-lama-please-stand-up/

With all these reports of the Dalai Lama's breaches of human rights in circulation coupled by the lack of legitimate response from the office of the Dalai Lama and the CTA, more and more questions are being asked about the authenticity of the Dalai Lama's reputation as a man of peace and tolerance. It won't be long before Tibetans at large finally understand that what is at stake is not only the unity of of the people but also the legitimacy of the Tibetan Cause.

Would the real Dalai Lama please stand up


By Indy Hack @IndyHack

July 6th will mark the 79th birthday of the most iconic religious figure
in current popular culture, a figure most often associated with peace,
tolerance, non-violence and religious harmony, none other than Tenzin
Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama. Behind the carefully crafted and stage
managed image of the world’s most popular Buddhist monk lies a story of
religious persecution and political oppression inflicted on the Tibetan
people, not by the Chinese, but by the Dalai Lama himself.

For over 20 years the Dalai Lama has been trying to stop Tibetans from
practising a traditional Buddhist Deity called Dorje Shugden, a practice
he himself used to engage in. He has so far instituted an official ban
on the practice, has forced monks out of their monasteries for refusing
to give up the practice and most recently the Tibetan government has
gone as far as to criminalise the practice.

Dorje Shugden is a traditional Buddhist protector Deity which was
popularly practised within the largest school of Tibetan Buddhism, the
Gelug school, as well as amongst approximately 30% of the Tibetan
population in general, according to Thupten Wangchen of the Tibetan
government. Prior to 1996 just under 2 million Tibetans practised Dorje
Shugden in accordance with instructions they had received from their
teachers, yet for reasons the Dalai Lama has failed to properly explain
he officially banned it.

In 1996 the Tibetan government unanimously passed a resolution stating
that, “the departments, their branches and subsidiaries, monasteries and
their branches that are functioning under the administrative control of
the Tibetan Government-in-Exile should be strictly instructed, in
accordance with the rules and regulations, not to indulge in the
propitiation of Shugden.” And so began the Tibetan government’s drive to
abolish the practice of Dorje Shugden and exclude people from jobs and
monasteries if they refused to give up their practice. As Tenzin Peljor
of the German Buddhist Monastic Association said of this situation. “To
enable a fair and democratic government in exile government members had to
stop Shugden practice or to leave.”

A further Tibetan government resolution passed in 1997 stated,
“Particularly in the Three Great Monastic Universities of Sera, Gaden
and Drepung, the restriction on Shugden practice should be kept up” It
went on to state that, “Efforts should be made to ensure that Shugden
practitioners do not receive tantric teachings.”

This was more than just advice that the Dalai Lama was offering about
which practices people should engage in, it was now a government
campaign to cleanse its monasteries and departments of anyone who
practised Dorje Shugden. Letters were sent to the various departments
such as the Health Department making it clear that Dorje Shugden
practitioners were to either stop their practice or they would have to
leave their jobs – this was the Dalai Lama’s view and it was ruthlessly
enforced by his government. Throughout the monasteries monks were forced
to swear an oath never to engage in the practice or they had to leave.

The resulting backlash from these draconian measures was a public appeal
to try and force the Dalai Lama to reverse his ban, protesters gathered
outside the Dalai Lama’s teachings in Europe and the US trying to draw
attention to the growing problems the ban was causing. However the Dalai
Lama refused to back down and so the conflict grew as did the reports of
people being persecuted, denied medical care and refused service in
shops on the basis of their religious beliefs.

Rebecca Novick, an author of 6 books on Tibetan Buddhism and culture,
referred to the large scale effects of the ban in a recent Huffington
Post article saying, “Shugden practitioners gradually became social
pariahs. Shopkeepers refused to sell to them, and landlords refused to
rent to them. In 2008 the Tibetan leadership ordered the monasteries in
South India to purge their populations of Shugden devotees. Monks who
had formerly lived like brothers were now forbidden to talk to one
another.” At the same time the Dalai Lama continued to travel the world
and preach to people about the benefits of religious tolerance and
harmony, clearly words that he failed to follow in his own actions
towards Dorje Shugden practitioners.

In March of this year the Tibetan Parliament in Exile unanimously passed
a resolution recognising that Dorje Shugden practitioners are,
“criminals in history”. Whereas previously there had been an official
ban of the practice it had now been criminalised, making it illegal to
practice in the legislative eyes of the Tibetan government.

In May of this year the Dalai Lama visited Oslo, Norway to celebrate the
25th Anniversary of his Nobel Peace Prize and he was once again greeted
by hundreds of protesters from Europe and the US which included western
and Tibetan Dorje Shugden practitioners. During an interview at the
Nobel Institute the Dalai Lama said, “I never made a decision banning…no
question of banning”, and several prominent scholars such as Robert
Thurman have supported this position.

In an article for the Huffington Post professor Thurman stated that,
“their chosen deity was not “banned” by the Dalai Lama, since he has no
authority to “ban” what Tibetan Buddhists practice.” However professor
Thurman chooses to overlook the fact that at the time of the of the
first official ban of the practice in 1996 the Dalai Lama was the head
of state of the Tibetan Government in Exile. He had political
jurisdiction over the exile Tibetan population and therefore had the
means and the authority not only to ban the practice but to also ensure
that the ban was enforced throughout the various departments and
monasteries of the government.

Other supporters of the Dalai Lama have claimed that a ban could not
have been enacted since the Tibetan exile population resides mostly in
India and is therefore subject to the laws of India, they believe that
the Tibetan government doesn’t have the ability or authority to pass
laws. This view however is not supported by the Tibetan government who
state on their website that, “From 1991 onwards TPiE [the Tibetan
Parliament in Exile] became the Legislative Organ of CTA [the Tibetan
government], while Tibetan Supreme Justice Commission is the Judiciary
Organ and the Kashag, Executive Organ said to be Three Pillars of
Democracy.  TPiE began to pass laws for the Tibetans in exile and the
Charter for Tibetans in Exile is one of the first important legal
document passed by the Parliament and approved by His Holiness on May
16th 1991”.

Whereas the Dalai Lama states that there is no ban the facts aren’t
there to support this claim. According to the Oxford English Dictionary
a ban is to, “officially or legally prohibit something”. In 1996 when
the Tibetan government passed a resolution instructing people not to
engage in the practice of Dorje Shugden and then told people to stop or
leave their jobs they had officially prohibited the practice. This was
when the Dalai Lama was the head of the Tibetan government and was in
charge of the Parliament – by all definitions he banned the practice
officially in 1996. So when he said in 2014 that there was no ban he was
either mistaken or purposefully being untrue, the latter of which is
most likely.

In an effort to avoid discussing the issue it is often mired in
religious doctrinal arguments, however if you leave those to one side
and focus instead on the political activities of the Dalai Lama and the
Tibetan government a situation of religious discrimination and
government persecution comes sharply into focus. Not only are Tibetan
Dorje Shugden practitioners banned from working for the government and
studying in its monasteries they are also subject to state surveillance.

During the Dalai Lama’s teachings in Oslo, Norway on May 8th of this
year a member of the Dalai Lama’s entourage was pictured photographing
Tibetan protesters. Later in Frankfurt, Germany Tenzin Peljor of the
German Buddhist Monastic Association was likewise pictured photographing
Tibetan protesters outside the Dalai Lama’s teachings at St Peters
Church. Less than a week later the Tibetan government issued a list of
Tibetans who had participated in the protests. The list contains 34
people, alongside their photographs are their names, a brief summary of
their activities and in one case they included the home address of a
woman who had been protesting.

It is truly extraordinary for a democratic government to issue a public
list of people who are peacefully protesting against its policy of
religious discrimination. Peaceful protest is a right enshrined in the
very heart of democracy, the idea that the government is there to
represent the people. It is also a perceived human right arising out of
the right to freedom of assembly and the right to freedom of speech. For
a government to take such a hardline approach as to conduct a ‘name and
shame’ campaign to try and suppress its citizens right to peaceful
protest speaks volumes.

So on his 79th birthday the Dalai Lama will no doubt be lauded in the
popular press for his contributions to world peace and religious
harmony, however behind the smoke and mirrors of his public persona is
the reality of a ruthless politician who is prepared to publicly lie,
suppress religious freedom and violate human rights in order to compel
his people to follow his demands. Not what you would expect from a Nobel

Peace Prize winning Buddhist Monk.

[icy]

Behind the curtain of peace, there lies the truth of religious oppression and human rights violation by the world renowned icon of peace, a Noble Prize Award Winner, the 14th Dalai Lama.  The London Economic gave a most accurate and actual situation that has been happening in the Tibetan community for the past 20 years in which millions have endured much suffering due to the oppression of Shugden Buddhists.

The whole World is watching and more media like The London Economic will reveal the truth behind the curtain of peace.  The Tibetan leadership has to eventually give way to the pressure of world religious freedom and human rights movements to backdown and lift the ban.  The disguise of a politician as a Nobel
Peace Prize winning Buddhist Monk is hurting the reputation of the Dalai Lama as long as the ban is not revoked.

[Blueupali]

Thank you for posting this VajraTruth.  If only more people were aware of this sort of thing; it's hard when people are so easily brainwashed.  I do wonder what happened to Kelsang Pema; she was a really clear and good spokesperson during protests who really brought the issues to the forefront.  I miss her.

[icy]

[Kim Hyun Jae]

The London Economic's article was well written presenting all the Facts around the issue of the Dorje Shugden ban. The world is clearly watching including journalists, newspaper etc. The magnitude of this ban ain't small.

"Would the Nobel Prize winner stand up to face the world" now? We have been waiting for 20 years to get an answer from you.

[christine V]

Wow, very well written on the situation that the refugees faced currently.

If Dalai Lama still insisted on this banned; I think His Holiness name and fame will be questions by the world very soon. It is not about what are you worship any more. It is about using religion as tool of politics to suppressed own people which are same as refugees status. It is about Human Rights! 

CTA- if you care. Please do not lies and imposed on the ban. Lift the ban early to save your face.

 

[DharmaSpace]

This is interesting, well written and with the times.

There are many people out there who understands logic and can put things together and see that this ban is real and no matter the CTA or the Dalai Lama denies it more and more people are beginning to find out about this.

The longer the CTA maintains the ban the worst it will be for them when the ban lifts, it is not about I told you so. It is that how much more battered will CTA's reputation be when the world discovers they have been lying to the world. Then the CTA not only makes enemy with China they have made enemies with the rest of the world, who will support CTA then?

[icy]

I like what you wrote Dharmaspace.  It is only logic that the ban need to go.  It does not benefit anyone but it definitely will eventually hurt the Dalai Lama and CTA.

[prodorjeshugden]

It is really shocking to see how the CTA and the Dalai Lama treats Shugden practitioners.
The Dalai Lama is called the ambassador of peace by people, but what those people don't know is that the Dalai Lama is actually one of the few behind the Dorje Shugden ban. The Dorje Shugden ban has caused a lot of disharmony and conflict within people, people who were once Dharma brothers and sisters  turned into deadly enemies overnight and those who practiced Dorje Shugden were the inferior ones who lived their lives knowing that any second they could be killed by mobs.

The Ban is not anything peaceful and harmonious, in has instead caused violence and disharmony, as such I really pray that the Dalai Lama can bring down the ban as soon as possible without any further violence.

[Tianni]

Very much appreciated this article. The world needs to know the the hidden story  of the Dorje Shugden’s ban. Very obviously that  we can see there is not religious freedom under the CTA. They published a “ list of people who are peacefully protesting against its policy of religious discrimination.”. How can a democratic government do this to their own people for simply protesting of religious freedom? The worst is it was already prove  that the ban has brought  disharmony and suffering to their own peoples but they still ban the Dorje  Shugden’s practice. Would you want this kind of government who created the suffering to their own peoples?