Author Topic: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014  (Read 13703 times)

icy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1491
If you miss "The Shugden Controversy and the 14th Dalai Lama" panel discussion organised by SOAS and London-Ney on Friday, 15th August 2014, you can now watch it here.  What are your thoughts on this discussion held here?

Http://www.livestream.com/tibetan

Blueupali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 464
    • Email
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2014, 06:21:45 AM »
Is this working for people or do we need to be there at a certain time of day.  I can't get this one to work.:(

DharmaSpace

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2014, 06:23:05 AM »
I am watching it now as we speak :), a bit cheeky i know, will post again after watching the recorded livestream.

Blueupali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 464
    • Email
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2014, 06:26:49 AM »
Good to know:).  I think it's my anti-virus software, so I'm glad you mentioned it:).

DharmaSpace

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2014, 11:40:39 AM »
These are my thoughts of what the speakers spoke and some of the things they have mentioned. TQVM dorjeshudgen,com for not making us miss this discussion.

Part 1 ->> 
Kelsang Rabten ->
CTA and the Dalai Lama have said that propitiating Dorje Shugden leads to shortness of life of the Dalai lama and Tibetan independence. How can a monk who holds his vows be harmed by a monk? The Tibetans lost their country all on their own accord just because the CTA has been ineffective of engaging further with China, certainly you can't blame Dorje Shugden?

Geshe Tashi Tsering ->
He actually said he was not representing any organisation,  but you did not come from a particular monastery? its like once you suck out the nutrients just discard where you were trained or come from.

He claimed Dorje Shugden was not part of Je Tsongkhapa's teachings neither is Nechung, who came about after subjugation from Padmasambhava, Shakyamuni did not prophesize about Nechung. In fact now CTA consults him
on the matters of state.

If Nechung was allowed to do as he please, the world would not have known the Dalai Lama, had the monks taken the advice of Nechung.

In the music delighting and ocean of protectors by Trijang Rinpoche said people who think there should not be a protector as powerful as Dorje Shudgen to protect Je tsongkhapa's lineage is clearly mistaken.

So the Sakyas could not recognise the difference between an enlightened dharma protector or a spirit? So the Sakyas are a bit fuzzy like the Gelugs, we cannot recognise a spirit from an enlightened protector?   

If Dorje Shugden is a spirit, can't you exorcise him, a divisive spirit should be easy to dispel. Trijang Rinpoche ascended the Gaden throne twice hello. So there are Gaden Tripa who were loyal followers of Dorje Shugden.

Carol McGuire ->
Yes as i mentioned previously the Dorje Shugden issue is not just about NKT or ex NKT people who have a bone to pick with NKT, there are many more organisations and lamas and practitioners outside of NKT or separate from it.
The monks at Shar Gaden/ Serpom are not part of NKT and life is difficult when you are surrounded by lay people and other people who constantly make life difficult for you.

The 3 benefits of propitiating a dharma protector is the same across the board.

Her talk is more of a criticism of NKT than of Dorje Shugden..... it is like since NKT is no good Shugden is bad too as thats their main practice.

She does not understand the guru student relationship, in vajrayana you are responsible to do checking yourself your teacher, if you have chosen a Guru then just follow all the way. No wonder Maitreya will no teach Tantra. She is clearly out of depth with regards to this discussion

Martin A Mills ->

He was doing dissertation in the Ladakh area in the late nineties and was taken in by a Gelug monasteries and there side by side the Ladakh sangha revered Dorje Shugden and Dalai lama side by side. 

A monastery in Ladakah may or may not be representative of the entire Gelug hierarchy as Ladakh is at the Tibetan border, even up to now you can see how Tibetans refer to buddha as god. So language always can be confusing. 

Thierry Dodin ->
A shame can't hear what he was talking about....

John McBretney ->

Thanks for showing the VIDEO - so people can see the ban, I myself have been to Shar Gaden there was an old monk abandoned by his students because he wanted to keep his samaya with his teacher and carry on Dorje Shugden practice. He was blind in the end due to lack of care and now being cared by Shar Gaden.

Nathan Hills ~ Moderator

He obviously does not know that magic rituals or supernatural beings CANNOT affect a pure monk. Also he said harm to Tibet cannot come from Dorje Shugden but from perhaps PLA and external forces, soon CTA will say the gelug lamas colluded to bring the PLA into the central tibetan plains thats how far CTA would go.

I liked this point whereby he said just because the Shugden practice was a later introduction it does not invalidate Tsongkhapa tradition and he quoted Thomas Aquinas that just because there is no writing from him on Lady Fatima it does not mean she is a demon or spirit.

Yamantaka was not openly known to the public during Ra Lotsawa's time and certainly Shakyamuni did not mention that publicly too so Yamantaka also a demon? We will end up having no practices and teachings the rate we are
dumping protectors, lamas and their teachings, lets all just go meditate on the breath only in the forest, there isn't anything beyond that! 

Nathan mentioned Carol's sharing was she liked what she learnt outside of NKT and did not like this. So Carol is just sharing her personal views, not a very factual kind of talk. And NKT is not unique at all, all that Carol pointed out is common to all kinds of Buddhist organisations.

He said based on Martin's talk in Ladakah , DS and Dalai Lama equally revered, normal part of the ritual program. Early part of the 1990's unproblematic, between Dorje Shugden and Dalai Lama.

Nathan said from Thierry he learnt that the 14th Dalai Lama sometimes tended to refer back to the 5th Dalai Lama. The 5th Dalai Lama's time was when it all started, he made statue and chapel to Dorje Shugden and apologised for the death Tulku Dragpa Gyeltsen. So the 14th Dalai Lama is not following the Great 5th as claimed.

Though Gelug hierarchy and HHDL are closely intertwined yet the HHDL has his own particular agenda,so the Dalai Lama may not always have the Gelug tradition in the best interest. And that Thierry said no controversy is black and white.


Part 2 ->> 

Kelsang Rabten ->
He refuted the monk's claims that there is no linkage between Dorje Shugden and Je Tsongkhapa, by saying the previous incarnation of Dorje Shugden was Duldzin Drakpa Gyeltsen. Duldzin was tasked in building Gaden and coming up with a syllabus, no easy feat and showed that Duldzin was of the same spiritual attainment as Je Tsongkhapa.   

As for the 101st Gaden Tripa in order to teach his students and take care of the monastery he had to hide his faith. If one say thats wrong then one can also say it wasn't right for the jews to hide from the Nazis?

He also said there was Geshe who was there during Pabongka time who wrote about the time of Je Pabongka and it is in a book. 

Geshe Tashi Tsering ->
There is no ban. Sounds more like personal attack. The three monks killed is not proven in any court of law. Yet again China and DOrje Shugden practitioners are made scapegoats.

Carol ->
I have no issue of saying a prayer for HHDL if he passes away. What would that prove? The Karmpaa issue dear carol was created by HHDL recognizing Karmapa, thats not the correct protocol, why rock the boat ? Geshe Kelsang Gyatso was expelled due to the ban hello?

Mills
Monasteries are autonomous and HHDL does not have the authority to ban this practice. In 1998 Ladakhis were holding their breaths they don't want the controversy to come to  the Ladakhis.

He said dharma protectors are Constitutional deities, well i think it is people who politicise practices not the Dharmpalas themselves or are in the nature of. 

CTA putting this kind of list out, and ISC protesting is counterproductive to both ? Hmm i think the
good professor does not look at all elements of the DS movement, there is Shar Gaden and Serpom, the dorjeshugden website, Trijang Rinpoche and many more good that has come out from Dorje Shudgen practitioners working together. We have no way to address this issue, at least we are non violent.

John McBretney ->
Reiterated the conditions for stooping the Ban. We don't want to demonstrate, but if there is no avenue for dialogue and negotiations then the demonstrations will carry on.

Nathan Summing Up
Dalai Lama Appoints the Gaden Tripa, I think this happened due to the 5th Dalai Lama time when he was given the authority over the political and spiritual aspects of Tibet. Reading Pabongka Rinpoche's he did not find this lama was promoting against violence against other sects.





 

icy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1491
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2014, 02:50:23 PM »
What I like very much is anthropologist speaker Martin. He gave me hope for his unbiased and untainted views and his clear understanding that Tibetan protectors have always been made into constitutional entities of political warfare (an equivalent of a political scapegoat). His experience with the abbot of Ladakhi monastery tells him who the Tibetans would follow and ditch. He sees this conflict as counter productive and calls for further action.

Generally the discussion was positive. Even Theiry has something positive to say that CTA website isn't a good thing. Carol needs a doctor. She is there for personal agenda. Of course Geshe Tashi Tsering is as distorted as he said his note was.

May there be more of such discussions to create more awareness and understanding of DS.  DS getting more famous!

icy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1491
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2014, 09:44:30 PM »
You can now watch this discussion on YouTube.  However the sound is still not as good, probably it was recorded off livestream.

Panel talk at SOAS on Dorje Shugden


icy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1491
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2014, 01:36:31 PM »
Now you can listen to the whole Panel Discussion in one recording from YouTube with pretty good and clear sound:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUUkHUNbVQ9G4Y-fcCxqO6JA&v=rfFYs4GctnQ#t=33


Kim Hyun Jae

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
    • Email
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2014, 03:58:12 PM »
Thanks to the Dorje Shugden supporter who took the liberty to record down this important panel discussion to share with us here on dorjeshugden.com and to the organizer at the University of London who granted this event to take place.



yontenjamyang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
    • Email
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2014, 04:56:22 AM »
Thanks Dorje Shugden and particularly Icy for this video and thread. Icy for his/her humorous and fair opinion and observation on the discussion.

While he panelist are not the best for the subject matter apart from perhaps Martin Mills, I am very encourage that there is this kind of open discussion at all. Also, the discussion has pointed out certain facts about the issue such as the 14th Dalai Lama is not actually following the 5th Dalai Lama, that there IS really a ban and that Protector practitioners respect both the Dalai Lama and the Protector. The last fact is important as it shows, Protector Dorje Shugden practitioners are not against the Dalai Lama.

I hope to see more of such open discussion sto educate both sides and for the world to acknowledge the results of the ban ie the sufferings that occurred as a result of this ban.

Thanks Again.

Big Uncle

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1995
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2014, 05:42:11 AM »
I am happy like mentioned before in comments elsewhere regarding this but I feel that the Dorje Shugden side is under-represented. NKT is a huge organisation but they do not represent all of Shugden practitioners. There are many lamas out there along with their students that can be roped in to speak on this subject matter. Inclusion of other lamas and centres would make the Shugden side more rounded and it would be fair for them. Nonetheless, this is the first discussion/dialogue of its kind and I do hope this would encourage and spur more of other such discussions in the future.

Blueupali

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 464
    • Email
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2014, 07:31:58 AM »
I agree it's good to bring awareness, but yes the Dorje Shugden side is definitely under-represented.  They think this isn't important because they aren't taking sides, but you know the Dalai Lama's voice is always getting heard and everybody else drowned out.  So, the NKT survivor-- why was she invited?  I don't know about her in particular, but there are definitely those in the NKT who come, put on robes, whatever, but never were there with any intention other than to make us look bad--- so why do we need survivor voices--- when we don't even give other Shugdens a voice....
   

Lineageholder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #13 on: August 18, 2014, 09:11:33 AM »
I am happy like mentioned before in comments elsewhere regarding this but I feel that the Dorje Shugden side is under-represented. NKT is a huge organisation but they do not represent all of Shugden practitioners. There are many lamas out there along with their students that can be roped in to speak on this subject matter. Inclusion of other lamas and centres would make the Shugden side more rounded and it would be fair for them. Nonetheless, this is the first discussion/dialogue of its kind and I do hope this would encourage and spur more of other such discussions in the future.

What is your concern about representation? Don't you think that the ISC can represent the concerns of all Shugden practitioners? If not, why not?

icy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1491
Re: Panel Discussion Organised by SOAS and London-Ney - 15th August 2014
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2014, 11:18:54 AM »
Fantastic - DS.COM is super efficient in getting the panel discussion into one Youtube link in super speed a clearer version and quality. So now we are able to watch the complete panel discussion at DS.COM.  For your easy reference here is the link:

http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/news/the-shugden-controversy-a-panel-discussion/comment-page-2/#comment-195705

Thank you DS.COM!