I'm sorry, but what evidence would you have that any of this would be the fault of DS.com? Sometimes we get different people on the forums who say things they shouldn't. However, that doesn't mean they are from DS.com. They could be anybody.
I don't understand what you are even talking about, to be honest with you. However if you say we at a certain monestary have elected not to even talk about the latest scandel at DS.com or something, well, then you have elected to talk about it, then haven't you, and also not elected to tell anyone what you are talking about, so how on earth could the other side present it's facts or opinions and how could it do anything but disparage DS.com if you insinuate that they do wrong things but won't back yourself up. Who are you anyway?