Can you prove that Geshe Kelsang Gyatso is behind NKT's stupid, defamatory statements?
Well who else could it be?
Your far fetched assumption is anything except for the proof you were supposed to offer.
They are all so robotic,
Right, but being robotic means that they will believe any idiot claiming to represent the views of Geshe Kelsang Gyatso, if they are not already the idiots claiming to represent such views.
they will dare do anything if only Geshe-la approves.
Or that they in their idiocy
believe Geshe Kelsang Gyatso approves, if they are not already the ones making others believe in such approval.
It is well known, can ask any NKT/ex-NKT.people claiming to represent the views of their teachers
Everywhere one will find people claiming to represent the views of their teachers, and blind believers believing the former. There is no need to single out NKT in this respect. And there is no evidence that you yourself are not included in one, or both, of such categories, specially when you display your fanboy hatred against such a holy guru as Geshe Kelsang Gyatso.
And such a zainy idea can only come from Geshe-la.
Assuming that you are talking about the idea behind the statement, wherefrom comes your assumption?
Indeed, Geshe Kelsang Gyatso is known for uttering only and strictly pure Buddhist teachings throughout his whole life as a teacher, without even the slightest trace of the hatred, spitefulness, envy, and harmfulness, as seen in both the Kelsangs' and your statements.
You think these kind of defamatory statements would come naturally and daringly from the Kelsangs?
Why not? Why should defamatory statements come from you but not from them? Do you believe that being a hateful fanboy of another guru guarantees that you are better than any of the crooked Kelsangs?
You think they would dare go against their own Guru's Guru IF Geshe-la did not agree and told them to do so and give them the green light?
Going against one's own guru is a phenomenon most seen in Buddhism. The evil dalie goes against Trijang Rinpoche, many Buddhists go against the Buddha's teachings, and so forth. Why shouldn't the crooked Kelsangs go against Geshe Kelsang Gyatso?
On the other hand, according to your own logic, you must have received the green light from some crooked guru of yours in order to defame a holy teacher such as Geshe Kelsag Gyatso, whereby you should at least follow the example of the crooked Kelsangs and identify your own crooked guru.
Think about it, who is the top?
Are you so silly to think that ideas always come from the top?
For instance, in the case of the evil dalie, the evil ideas definitely come from the top gangster, the evil dalie himself, because there is plenty of hard evidence showing that this is the case. However, except for your own sick assumptions, this is not at all the case with such a holy teacher as Geshe Kelsang Gyatso.
And again, according to your own crooked logic, one must assume that your own defamation against such a holy teacher as Geshe Kelsang Gyatso must come from the top, whereby now you owe the rest of us the identification of who is the mastermind behind your own vile behavior.
He is the greatest mastermind,
Why are you so concerned with the Kelsangs' mastermind, when you lack the guts to identify the mastermind behind your own defamation?
he was the one who asked them to start the protest against Dalai Lama and attempted to bring Dalai Lama to court.
And what is wrong with this? Why should a criminal not be protested against and brought to court?
What proof? Let's just say an old cat from the NKT block whispered to me and I am sure many others.
This one about protesting against and suing the evil dalie requires no proof, as it is a virtuous, skilful action. If Geshe Kelsang Gyatso did not publicly declare his authorship it was most likely because of modesty.