Ordination is central and vital in Je Tsongkhapa's tradition which is why 'Tulku' Trijang is fake.
Wrong. Trijang Choktrul is “fake” because NKT is afraid of disintegrating after Geshe Kelsang Gyatso's passing away.
NKT needs to assert its relevance in the absence of Geshe Kelsang Gyatso, which it does trying to disparage its perceived competition, that is, other Shugden lamas.
Therefore, Trijang Choktrul is “fake”, Gonsar Rinpoche is a “troublemaker”, tulkus in general are fake, whatever, as long as NKT can distract people from their lack of a worthy successor to Geshe Kelsang Gyatso.
After Geshe Kelsang Gyatso's passes away, his students will massively flock to other Shugden lamas, and this is precisely what corporate NKT fears and desperately wishes to prevent.
NKT's anxiety to disparage such other Shugden lamas is just a measure of its corporate despair.
He's not the continuation of Trijang Rinpoche as this great master would never show the example of disrobing, would never marry and would never have children .
Maybe the previous Trijang Rinpoche simply forgot to ask your idiotic authorization.
The layman Vimalakirti was equal to the Buddha, and superior to any other monks and bodhisattvas, but according to your imbecile logic he would be a “fake” too.
Indeed, Vimalakirti was married, had children and even run a business. But, as opposed to NKT monk-bureaucrats, he was not into preaching puritanism as a means of ensuring corporate survival.
The funny thing here is that those who most boast about “renunciation” are those most motivated by mundane goals, such as ensuring their own corporate survival.
And since their motivation is so vile, it's no wonder that they resort to disparaging teachers they see as competitors, such as other Shugden lamas, and tulkus in general.
which is the opposite of renunciation
You are not interested in “renunciation”, you are interested in NKT's mundane, corporate survival.
Behind every obsessive moralistic preaching one will find a greedy priest, monk, or pseudo-renunciate.
You think this pure monk would show the example of enjoying samsara?
Why not? Let alone Vimalakirti, even the Buddha enjoyed samsara, if you ever heard about his life and deeds.
Meanwhile, NKT's impure, depraved, greedy, pseudo-monk bureaucrats, obsessed only with their own corporate survival, afraid of their own corporate disintegration, while attached to samsara cannot even enjoy it.
You humiliate him because by accepting that he would do these things is tantamount to saying he had no experience of renunciation which is nonsense.
Renunciation is a quality of mind, not an external, social status, or type of cloth.
Therefore, your ridiculous, infantile attempt to equate renunciation with being a “monk” shows your thorough lack of understanding of even the most basic Buddhist teachings.
--
As to the propagandistic usage of the term “humiliate”, repeating NKT's official propaganda, it is intended to create the idea that NKT is the “guardian” or “defender” of Trijang Rinpoche's inheritance, supposedly spoiled by non-NKT “illegitimate” lamas.
This usage again betrays NKT's desperate need to assert its relevance in a world without Geshe Kelsang Gyatso, or, in other words, the fear of its impending disintegration.
Feeling angry and impotent about its own bleak future, NKT resorts to gratuitous aggression and defamation.
