I am very surprised to find the negative reaction to practices like divination or oracles etc. Just because it’s not in the lamrim doesn’t mean it is not valid.
And dear lineageholder, for discussion sake, I would like to quote you that you said “like Tantra, it can be misused for mundane purposes”. Well, even monk robes can be misused for mundane purposes – you should visit Asia where some don monk robes to get donations!
The fact is, divination methods (although it was made known here), you cannot practice it on your own without a Guru. And even if you wish to, perhaps your Guru might not think you are qualified. It is just like Tantra/ tantric practices.
I rejoice that TK has put up the methods so that we can all be aware that it’s not just some mystical initiation going on and ‘wa la’ the initiated now has superpowers to get answers from the God.
You're right in saying that just because something doesn't exist in the lamrim, doesn't mean it isn't valid...that is akin to saying other traditions are not valid, because they don't follow the teachings set out in the lamrim.
I would add that the fact is, ANYTHING (whether tantra or not) can be misused for mundane purposes if the practitioner's motivation is a little off-centre. Even something as 'simple' as a black tea can be misused for a mundane purpose - how many people do you know offer black tea so their luck goes up, their nan is cured, their child passes an exam, their business becomes better? At the end of the day, no matter how holy the method, if the motivation is stained, so the entire action is tainted.
And I rejoice along with you re: TK's post. The fact TK has posted the methods shows that there is a method for it, and it isn't something just plucked out from the sky...and that it IS something attainable for everyone, if they put their hearts and minds to it, and weren't doing it just for themselves because that sort of motivation is impermanent.
Thank you honeydakini and WoselTenzin for your explanation. I find it weird why is it that there are much debate about practices or things that are not considered 'mainstream' or scholarly in this forum, e.g. divination, oracles etc. I mean any practice has its value and I am sure masters who kept these practices alive have their reasons to keep them and pass on their lineages.
Glad that this is still a democratic forum!
I recently had a conversation with a friend about this because I suggested Setrap's practice and he just couldn't get his head around it, despite being strong in his devotion to Lama Tsongkhapa (I didn't push it, Tsongkhapa's good enough right?
).
I guess it's a cultural thing - some people simply don't believe that deities such as Setrap exist, but find it easier to believe that Lama Tsongkhapa and his teachings existed because he was an actual historical person. Likewise, some find it more difficult to believe in divinations and oracles, and prefer to focus on teachings they can apply directly to themselves (e.g. Eight Verses of Mind Transformation is something anyone can practise as it lacks any esoteric aspects).
Of course, it's not something I understand because if you believe Lama Tsongkhapa existed and was 100% valid in all he did, saw and taught, then you also believe he saw visions of Manjushri. So why be so selective in which deities you believe exist, and you believe don't (e.g. Manjushri exists, but Setrap doesn't)? Likewise, if you believe Tsongkhapa had attained Enlightenment (and therefore omniscience) and could see the route the monasteries would take with divinations and oracles, and he knew those practices were of no benefit, why did he not ban them outright?
But to each their own...I definitely think that acceptance of the validity of divinations and oracles is a cultural thing.