100th Gaden Tripa from Drepung Loseling Monastery was very questionable
click here to see:http://dorjeshugden.com/wp/?p=1026comments from the same page:Master Loo Sheng-yan is a controversial monk based in USA originally from Taiwan. He openly claims he is an
enlightened Buddha, that he had tea with Shakyamuni, and many other controversial statements.
The 100th Gaden Tripa Lobsang Nyima was from Drepung Loseling. This Tripa openly discouraged and
criticized Dorje Shugden s practice. He was not very popular also as he openly criticized kyabje Pabongka
and in certain interviews mentions he doesnt know if Pabongka was beneficial to the Buddhadharma or not. He
passed away in 2009.
Here he was seen sitting on throne next to Master Loo in Master Loo’s Kurukule Puja.
This Tripa is said to have received monetary help and assistance from Master Loo.
His throne is not in the center and at the same level as master loos which itself is not a good representation for
Gaden Tripas status and office.
Many people would say that this Tripa was not holding his prestige and office well.
Although doing this and it is on the youtube, the Tibetan Govt keeps quiet. Loseling Monastery is completely
silent. No one is reprimanded because this Tripa toe the line with Tibetan Govts policy of anti Shugden.
It is not the interest of this website to highlight this Tripa and his actions in a bad light, but you can judge for
yourself.
If you follow the Tibetan govts policies, you are supported no matter what you do. If it is embarrassing, it is
hushed up.
—————————————- ———————
The previous (100th) Ganden Tripa, Lobsang Nyingma Rinpoche, stated: “If it [Shugden] were a real protector,
it should protect the people. There may not be any protector such as this, which needs to be protected by the
people. Is it proper to disturb the peace and harmony by causing conflicts, unleashing terror and shooting
demeanous words in order to please the Dharmapala? Does this fulfill the wishes of our great masters? Try to
analyze and contemplate on the teachings that had been taught in the Lamrim [stages of path], Lojong [training
of mind] and other scriptural texts. Does devoting time in framing detrimental plots and committing degrading
act, which seems no different from the act of attacking monasteries wielding swords and spears and draining
the holy robes of the Buddha with blood, fulfill the wishes of our great masters?”[100]
and
The Mahayana teachings advocate an altruistic attitude of sacrificing few for the sake of many. Thus why is it
not possible for one, who acclaims oneself to be a Mahayana, to stop worshipping these dubious gods and
deities for the sake and benefit of the Tibetans in whole and for the well-being of His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
In the Vinaya [Buddhist code of discipline], it is held that since a controversial issue is settled by picking the
mandatory twig by “accepting the voice of many by the few” the resolution should be accepted by all. As it has
been supported by ninety five percent it would be wise and advisable for the rest five percent to stop
worshipping the deity keeping in mind that there exists provisions such as the four Severe Punishments
[Nan tur bzhi], the seven Expulsions [Gnas dbyung bdun] and the four Convictions [Grangs gzhug bzhi] in the
Vinaya [Code of Discipline].[100]
Also:PanchenGreat says:
February 12, 2010 at 4:19 am
davidson,
The 100th Gaden Tripa was an unpopular figure beyonds the gates of Drepung. He was very political and use his position for the betterment of Drepung Loseling Monastery. He was not concerned about other Gelugpa Monasteries, sad to say.
He hard selled Drepung Loseling quite alot.
This video shows clearly how political he was and had the support of Drepung Loseling’s Monastery for money. Of course Master Loo would donate huge amounts to Gaden Tripa Lobsang Nyima and Loseling. Those are the cold hard facts and difficult truths. Most Gaden Tripas are very saintly. A few were questionable.
Extracted & Posted by tk