HD, I like your posts, and I think a lot of readers here like them, for they don't put fuel on the fire, they don't "take side", they are informative and put the topic back on track.
Now, about Lucy James, I really can't answer the question.
Yet, I would like that we go back to some basic before we scrutinize other peole's relation with their Gurus, as this exercise could be pretty un-conclusive when our mind is clouded by delusions.
The Lamrim lists FOUR GREATNESSES OF THE DHARMA:
1. the greatness of allowing you to realize that the teachings are without contradiction
(that requires humility, open-mindedness as well as a sincere and pure motivation AND WE KNOW HOW HARD IT IS!)
2. the greatness of allowing all the teachings to present themselves to you as instructions
(that would equate to "walking the talk")
(AND THAT WON'T HAPPEN IF WE STILL SEE CONTRADICTIONS!)
3. the greatness of allowing you to easily discover the tue thinking of the Victorious One
(that would be to attain realizations)
(AND THAT WON'T HAPPEN IF WE DON'Y PRACTICE!)
4. the greatness of allowing you to save yourself from the worst misdeed
(AND THAT LIKELY TO HAPPEN IF WE DON'T GET ANY RESULT FROM OUR PRACTICE!)
(that would be to abandon Dharma)
The Lamrim also says that THE ROOT OF THE PATH IS DEVOTION TO ONE'S SPIRITUAL GUIDE (GURU).
Don't we all suppose that Lucy James knows this?
Maybe she has even realized these headings? I can't say, i don't know...
But sure, in the relationship between a Guru and and student, there is more than meet the eyes.
What more? I don't know, maybe in this case, there is nothing more than meet the eyes.
But on the basis that I don't know, I would rather refrain from making a judgement.