I thought that there where many people here who go along with the bigger picture idea, if that is so then why would you disagree with the ban?
I am so in agreement with this. I am 100% sure that everyone on this site disagrees with the Dalai Lama's ban and prays that he will rescind it or that the ban will eventually fade.
I agree we shouldn't over critisise the DL. Since he has lied and and displayed great hypocrasy, has created a Scism in the Sangha through his dictator type actions, I am ok with calling him these things.
I would not call him a pervert, a murderer etc because as far as I know he is not these things.
If someone is doing one on the five heinous actions on a massive scale, is it our job to let them, should we turn our back on their actions and pretend they are not doing it?
to disagree with the ban means to disagree with the repercussions of the ban and the actions it has led to, such as the ostracisation, the attacks, segregation and the way that TGIE and other dl followers have started acting. it also means to disagree with the illogical reasons given for the ban because it does not make sense.
This is not in contradiction to believing in a bigger picture where we believe that there is something more vast occuring which we cannot yet perceive or graps. it is also does not contradict the stance of criticising the dalai lama.
some of us disagree with the actions of the ban but choose not to criticise the dalai lama as a person. There is a difference in discussing the actions and actually calling someone a liar because that immediately becomes a personal attack already and we do not wish to do that, respecting the fact that he is still the refuge and guru of many millions of people in the world.
as tk has pointed out in recent posts and i also agree strongly, I believe it makes a much stronger and convincing stance if we:
- present the facts
- show people what is happening
- share information about what is going on, for example in tibetan communities and to the ds practitioners in these communities
People can see clearly for themselves then what is going on and make an informed decision. simply calling someone a liar and dictator over and over already becomes personal and easily starts sounding biased. Personally, if i met someone who just told me to my face that dalai lama is a liar, dictator etc it would turn me off from the start and i would not take him seriously. it would just sound fanatical and un-buddhist to be using those words. i would be more convinced of the situation if i was given all the facts and if someone discussed the logic or illogic of the situation with, and if i was given enough respect to make my own decision regarding something as important as a spiritual practice.